M&A

Sign in and every point here is shaded by what you have shown you know. As a visitor you see the points; the shading is yours alone.

1. Can you describe how deferred revenue might be adjusted in a merger model?

   Not measured yet
   • Deferred revenue is a liability representing cash already collected for goods or services not yet delivered.●●○○○
   • Historically, the buyer wrote acquired deferred revenue down to fair value — approximately the cost to perform plus a small profit margin.●●●○○
   • Under the old fair-value treatment, less revenue was recognized after close because the liability covered only cost plus margin, not the full contract value.●●○○○
   • The old write-down reduced the acquired deferred revenue balance on the opening balance sheet, and that reduction increased the amount allocated to goodwill.●●○○○
   • The old fair-value approach changed under ASU 2021-08 because it frequently contradicted ASC 606.●●●●●
   • The old fair-value approach made combined-company revenue hard to predict.●●●○○
   • Under ASU 2021-08, contract liabilities are no longer written down — they carry over at the target's book value.●●●●○
   • Revenue is recognized under the same ASC 606 principles the target already applied, flowing exactly as it would have on a standalone basis.●●●○○
   • Under ASU 2021-08, no purchase accounting adjustment touches goodwill.●●●○○

2. Stock vs Asset vs 338h(10) purchase

   Not measured yet
   • Stock purchase acquires all liabilitiesIn a stock purchase the buyer acquires the whole company including all assets and liabilities, with no ability to choose●●●●●
   • Asset purchase allows selective acquisitionIn an asset purchase the buyer can choose which assets and liabilities to acquire, which generally leads to a higher price●●●●●
   • Tax asymmetry between buyer and sellerStock purchase is best for the seller because the buyer cannot step up assets for tax savings; asset purchase is best for the buyer because written-up assets generate tax-deductible depreciation while the seller pays increased taxes●●●●●
   • Distressed sellers and NOL carryforwardAsset purchases are typically used when the seller is distressed, and NOLs are not carried forward in an asset purchase●●●○○
   • 338(h)(10) election dual tax treatmentA 338(h)(10) election treats the deal as a stock purchase for the seller but as an asset purchase for the buyer, giving the buyer depreciation from the write-up (at the cost of double taxation for the seller)●●●●○

3. What are break-even synergies? How are they calculated and what are they used for?

   Not measured yet
   • Break-even synergies are the amount of synergies a deal must deliver for the combined company's EPS to exactly equal the buyer's standalone EPS — the point where the deal is neither accretive nor dilutive.●●○○○
   • They are useful as a sanity check.●○○○○
   • If the break-even number exceeds realistic synergy estimates, the deal's accretion depends on synergies you probably won't get.●●●○○
   • The break-even synergy calculation works in two steps.●●●○○
   • First, build pro forma EPS with zero synergies: combine the two companies' net incomes, then subtract the after-tax interest expense on any new debt raised and the after-tax interest income given up on cash used to fund the deal.●●●○○
   • Divide that zero-synergy net income by the pro forma share count, which includes any new shares issued to the seller.●●○○○
   • If that zero-synergy pro forma EPS falls below the buyer's standalone EPS, multiply the per-share shortfall by the pro forma share count to get the after-tax synergies needed to close the gap.●●●○○
   • Then divide that after-tax shortfall by one minus the tax rate to gross it up to the pre-tax figure, which is break-even synergies — the number to compare against your synergy case.●●●●○

4. A company announces it will acquire another for $80/share. Why might the company (immediately after the announcement) not trade at $80/share?

   Not measured yet
   • The $80 is the offer price payable at closing.●●●○○
   • The gap between the offer price and the trading price is the merger arbitrage spread.●●○○○
   • Between announcement and close, the target's shares typically trade below the offer price.●●○○○
   • Time value: the $80 is only received at a future close, and an arbitrageur buying below $80 earns a return over the waiting period — the market discounts the offer back at the return demanded for that time.●●●○○
   • Execution risk: the deal may never close, because regulators can block it on antitrust grounds, shareholders can vote it down, financing can fall through, or a material adverse change can let the buyer walk.●●○○○
   • The more execution risk the market perceives, the wider the spread and the further the stock trades below the offer.●●●●○
   • Business risk: the target is still a living company between signing and closing, and market volatility or something impairing its standalone value can prevent the deal from closing.●●●●○
   • If part of the consideration is acquirer stock, the value the target's holders receive moves with the buyer's share price.●●○○○
   • Example: a sinkhole that destroyed a company's headquarters led to a deal's cancellation.●●●○○

5. What does a sources & uses schedule look like in an M&A transaction?

   Not measured yet
   • A sources and uses schedule is a two-sided summary: the left shows where the deal's funding comes from, the right shows where every dollar goes.●●○○○
   • New debt is broken out by tranche and seniority, each tranche listed as its own source line.●●●○○
   • The buyer's or sponsor's equity contribution appears as its own source line.●●○○○
   • Cash already sitting on the target's balance sheet can be put to work as a source.●●●○○
   • Rollover equity, where management or existing owners keep a stake rather than cashing out fully, is sometimes a source.●●●○○
   • The biggest use is usually the equity purchase price, the cost of buying the target's shares.●●○○○
   • A use is paying off the target's existing debt, along with the transaction and financing fees paid to bankers and lawyers.●●○○○
   • A use is any cash left on the balance sheet to fund the combined business, plus working capital adjustments if the actual closing balance sheet differs from what was assumed.●●●○○
   • The two sides must tie: every dollar of sources is spent on a use, so the totals are always equal.●●●○○

6. What are 2 ways an acquisition can create value (not accretion necessarily) for acquirers’ shareholders?

   Not measured yet
   • Value arbitrage is buying the target for less than its intrinsic value or net asset value.●●○○○
   • If the target's assets and going-concern value are worth $100 and the acquirer negotiates a price of $80, that $20 gap accrues to the acquirer's shareholders.●●●○○
   • The gap arises when the market has mispriced the target or a distressed seller must transact.●●●●○
   • Second way: synergies — the combined entity is worth more than the sum of the two companies separately●●○○○
   • Synergies come from cost sources such as eliminating duplicated overhead and consolidating procurement, and from revenue sources such as cross-selling to each other's customers or combining distribution●●●○○
   • Synergies are worth the present value of incremental cash flows net of one-time costs to achieve them●●●●●
   • The real test of value creation is whether the purchase price is below the target's standalone value plus synergies, not whether EPS goes up.●●●●○
   • Accretion is an EPS accounting outcome, while value creation means acquirers' shareholders are genuinely wealthier — the two can diverge.●●○○○

7. Imagine this scenario: A company worth $1.8B using 50% debt/equity. Over 5 years 450M cash flow paid, then exited. What does this sound like? What type of buyer? Why?

   Not measured yet
   • A company acquired with 50% debt and 50% equity, generating cash flow over five years and then sold, is a leveraged buyout (LBO).●●○○○
   • The buyer in this scenario is a financial buyer — a private equity sponsor — rather than a strategic acquirer.●●○○○
   • The scenario carries three classic fingerprints of an LBO: funding, horizon, and exit.●●●○○
   • The 50% debt/equity funding is a heavily leveraged purchase characteristic of sponsors.●●○○○
   • Sponsors use debt so they can control a large asset with only a small equity check.●●●○○
   • The five-year horizon matches the typical PE fund life, because PE funds are closed-end vehicles that must return capital to their limited partners.●●●○○
   • The planned exit at around five years distinguishes the sponsor from a strategic acquirer: the sponsor crystallizes its return by selling the company or taking it public, whereas strategic acquirers buy to hold indefinitely.●●●○○
   • High leverage, a defined holding period, and a planned exit point squarely to an LBO by a financial buyer.●●○○○

8. **In an acquisition involving a low-risk acquirer & a high-risk target, whose WACC should be used to discount the target’s cash flows?

   Not measured yet
   • WACC is the rate compensating capital providers for risk, so the discount rate must match the risk of the specific cash flows being discounted●●○○○
   • The target's standalone cash flows should be discounted at the target's WACC, regardless of who the acquirer is●●●○○
   • Applying the acquirer's lower WACC to risky target cash flows overstates their present value, because the acquirer's balance sheet does not make the target's business less risky●●○○○
   • Synergies are cash flows that exist only because the acquirer owns the target, so they are the acquirer's cash flows●●●●○
   • If the acquirer's lower cost of capital applies after the deal closes, the synergies should be discounted at the acquirer's WACC●●●○○
   • The discipline is one rate per cash-flow stream: target WACC for target flows, acquirer WACC for synergies●●●○○

9. In an M&A transaction, would an all-stock or all-cash deal fetch a higher premium? Why?

   Not measured yet
   • The premium is the amount paid above the target's unaffected share price, and all-stock deals typically fetch the higher premium●●○○○
   • In an all-stock deal the seller becomes a shareholder of the combined company and bears the downside if the merger underperforms●●●●○
   • Because the target receives the buyer's shares rather than cash, its ultimate payout depends on the post-close trading performance of those shares, so the target demands a larger premium as compensation for the riskier currency●●●○○
   • Offering stock can signal the buyer believes its own shares are overvalued, so the target demands more stock — a bigger premium — as compensation●●●○○
   • Cash has certainty of value●●●○○
   • Cash puts all the risk on the buyer●●●●○
   • The certainty of cash for both sides is why all-cash deals command lower premiums than all-stock deals●●○○○

10. What are considerations for the target in terms of receiving cash or stock in an M&A transaction?

    Not measured yet
    • The consideration choice determines the value certainty, upside exposure, and tax treatment the target's shareholders face after closing●●○○○
    • For stock, the deal is signed at a fixed exchange ratio, so swings in the acquirer's share price change the value the seller actually receives●●●○○
    • If the acquirer's stock trades in a frothy or overvalued market, the paper the seller accepts may be worth much less once a correction comes●●●○○
    • The target should assess the acquirer's expected performance, since the stock's future worth depends on how the buyer performs after the deal closes●●●●○
    • Stock consideration can often be structured as a tax-deferred reorganization, letting the seller postpone capital gains until the shares are sold●●●○○
    • Stock gives the target shareholders upside participation — they share in the synergies and future growth of the combined company●●○○○
    • For cash, the value is certain and not dependent on the buyer's future performance or on market movements before closing●●●○○
    • Cash lets the target capture the full upside directly, with the value locked at close and nothing left to share with the buyer●●●○○
    • Cash is directly taxed: the seller realizes the gain immediately, so after-tax proceeds are lower than the headline price●●○○○

11. What are considerations for the buyer to finance using cash, stock, or debt in an M&A transaction? When is it best to use each, respectively?

    Not measured yet
    • Stock financing conserves the buyer's cash and avoids adding leverage to the balance sheet.●●●○○
    • Stock shares risk with the seller because target shareholders receive shares in the combined company and keep exposure to its post-deal performance.●●●○○
    • The cost of stock financing is dilution — existing shareholders' ownership and claim on earnings shrink.●●●○○
    • Stock is the best currency when management believes its stock is overvalued, making that paper comparatively cheap financing.●●●●○
    • Stock is a bad choice when markets are poor or the stock is undervalued.●●●○○
    • Cash is best when the buyer has excess cash above operating needs earning low returns, and bad when spending it leaves no buffer for normal operations or a downturn.●●●○○
    • Debt is best when the company has debt capacity and capital markets can lend.●●●●○
    • Debt capacity isn't only EBITDA-based — asset-backed facilities and convertible debt also qualify.●●●○○
    • Debt is a bad choice when the company is already overlevered or debt market conditions are poor.●●●○○

12. What is the difference between cost synergies and revenue synergies, and which are easier to achieve?

    Not measured yet
    • A synergy is value created by combining two companies that neither could capture alone, and it comes in cost and revenue forms●●○○○
    • Cost synergies are the elimination of overlapping expense that exists because both companies already incur it — the target's duplicate headcount, facilities, or vendor spend is removed, so the saving is a subtraction from the combined cost base rather than a new source of value●●●○○
    • A cost synergy program can be sized and underwritten as a specific dollar figure before closing, because each line item maps to an identified duplicate that appears in the combined accounts●●●○○
    • Revenue synergies require a third party to change behavior after the deal — a customer must buy a cross-sold product or a sales team must push a new offering — so the lift cannot be counted on merely because the two businesses are combined●●●○○
    • Cost synergies are easier to achieve because they sit under management's direct control and can be executed against a specific line-item plan●○○○○
    • Revenue synergies are harder because they depend on unpredictable customer behavior — customers may not buy the bundled offering and sales teams may not push it●●○○○
    • Cost synergies are also faster to realize than revenue lifts, which is why acquirers typically underwrite deals primarily on the cost side●●○○○

13. Why is EPS a key metric in M&A deals?

    Not measured yet
    • EPS is net income divided by shares outstanding, so accretion/dilution measures what the deal does to each shareholder's slice of combined earnings●●●○○
    • A deal is accretive if post-acquisition EPS rises and dilutive if it falls●●●●○
    • Accretion is a quick, visible proxy for the immediate impact on shareholder value — it suggests the buyer paid a sensible price relative to the earnings acquired●●○○○
    • Accretive deals generally boost investor sentiment and the stock price, while dilutive deals do the opposite●●●○○
    • Because EPS is one of the most-watched metrics for shareholders, announced accretion or dilution acts as a key market signal of the deal's value and future performance●○○○○
    • Strategic buyers' management teams are incentivized to grow EPS because their compensation packages are often tied to EPS targets●●●○○

14. How do you think about short-term accretion/dilution vs long-term synergies? Would you ever buy a dilutive deal?

    Not measured yet
    • Short-term accretion/dilution is the immediate EPS impact at close, largely a mechanical outcome of the deal math●○○○○
    • A deal tends to be accretive on day one if the target's earnings yield exceeds the after-tax cost of the cash or debt financing it●●●●○
    • Buying a lower-P/E target with higher-P/E stock is mechanically accretive, which is why relative P/E drives short-term impact●●●○○
    • Long-term value depends on synergies — cost cuts and revenue lifts that phase in over years.●●○○○
    • Because synergies ramp over time, a deal that is dilutive in year one can become increasingly accretive in later years, so the year-one EPS number is not the correct verdict on the deal.●●●●○
    • Yes, companies do buy dilutive deals — the correct test is whether long-term synergies and strategic value outweigh the immediate EPS dilution●○○○○
    • Short-term dilution is acceptable when the synergy pool is large and credible.●●●●○
    • Dilution with no credible synergy path behind it is what a disciplined acquirer should refuse — the absence of a synergy case, not the dilution itself, is the disqualifier.●●●●○

15. Company A & B have revenues of $100. Combined, however, their revenue is $220 pre-synergies. How is that possible?

    Not measured yet
    • Two companies with $100 each should combine to roughly $200, so $220 pre-synergies is a premise error — the two revenue figures are not measured on the same basis●●○○○
    • The first question is what 'revenue' means here — is each figure LTM or the previous fiscal year? Only after confirming that should you hunt for explanations●●●○○
    • Because 'revenue' is ambiguous, a candidate who shows the $20 gap must identify which specific timing convention — LTM versus prior fiscal year — accounts for the mismatch, not merely note that revenue is ambiguous●●●●○
    • If one figure is LTM and the other is the prior fiscal year, or the two companies have different fiscal calendars with one rolled forward onto the buyer's fiscal year, the combined figure picks up extra months of one company's revenue●●●○○
    • Timing mismatch alone can explain the gap — question the premise before assuming the numbers are wrong●●○○○
    • The second suspect is currency: Company B may be overseas and reported in local currency●●○○○
    • The combined figure depends on when the exchange rate was struck — if the translation uses today's rate and the local currency strengthened since the reporting date, the target's revenue in dollars is higher than reported, producing a combined number above $200●●●●●
    • The $20 gap pre-synergies is almost certainly a measurement-basis error; the places to check are timing first — LTM vs fiscal year and calendar alignment — then the FX rate used for translation●●●○○

16. Let's say you want to sell a part of your company instead of the whole company. What are the ways you can do that? How are they different & what are the pros/cons?

    Not measured yet
    • A spinoff distributes shares of the division to existing shareholders as a separate listed company, so no third-party buyer is needed●●●●○
    • A spinoff can be structured tax-free because it is a pro-rata distribution to shareholders you already have●●●●●
    • A spinoff unlocks shareholder value by exposing an undervalued division and lets the parent retain exposure to the child company's upside●●●○○
    • Spinoff downsides: shareholders can't readily convert the stake to cash, no control premium is paid since there's no buyer, execution is slow, and it depends on capital markets being receptive●●●○○
    • A divestiture is an outright sale to a third party — it brings immediate cash, faster execution, a cleaner break, and a potential premium when sold to a synergy-paying competitor●●●●○
    • Divestiture downsides: the sale is generally taxable, third-party execution risk exists, and you typically hand the business to a direct competitor●●●○○
    • The choice comes down to a trade-off between speed of cash from a third-party sale and retained exposure to the business through a spinoff●●○○○

17. Currently your company is extremely overlevered at a 3x Debt/EBITDA ratio. How can an M&A deal actually lower this ratio? What companies would you be looking for?

    Not measured yet
    • Debt/EBITDA is debt divided by EBITDA, so an overlevered buyer only has two levers: reduce the numerator or grow the denominator●●●○○
    • What matters is the relative percentage change — the ratio falls if EBITDA grows proportionally more than debt, or debt falls proportionally more than EBITDA●●●●○
    • Buying a lower-levered target and paying with stock issuance or cash rather than new debt raises combined debt far less than combined EBITDA, so the blended ratio falls●●●○○
    • Structuring part of the purchase price as earn-outs lowers the cash that has to be borrowed at close, cutting debt raised upfront●●●○○
    • Divesting non-core assets after close and applying the proceeds to debt paydown directly reduces the numerator●●○○○
    • A target with high current EBITDA and credible expected synergies lifts the denominator without adding debt, mechanically lowering the combined ratio●●○○○
    • The profile sought: a lower-levered, high-EBITDA target with strong synergies, financed with stock or cash, with earn-outs and post-close divestitures trimming the debt actually raised●●○○○

18. What is the difference between a merger & an acquisition?

    Not measured yet
    • Both a merger and an acquisition produce one combined company; the operational distinction is who captures the control premium, while legally the line between the two can blur.●○○○○
    • In a true merger, the premium is shared roughly equally because neither side is clearly the controller — it's a partnership of near-peers.●●○○○
    • Because the value exchanged in a true merger is equity itself, these deals are almost always stock-for-stock at a fixed exchange ratio, and each side's shareholders end up owning the combined company in proportion to what they contributed.●●●○○
    • In an acquisition, the buyer is clearly in control, and the premium is paid as the price of taking over the board and the decisions.●●○○○
    • In an acquisition, the buyer pays a full control premium to the target shareholders, typically 20-40% over the standalone share price.●●●○○
    • In every case the premium is explicitly negotiated and paid to the target side only.●●●●○
    • The difference that decides which you have: a merger splits the premium between both shareholder groups, an acquisition hands it entirely to the target's shareholders.●●●○○

19. What are the different considerations often included in an M&A merger (stock and otherwise)

    Not measured yet
    • In stock-for-stock M&A, stock consideration comes in three forms: fixed exchange ratio, floating exchange ratio, and collar●●●●○
    • A fixed exchange ratio locks the number of buyer shares per target share at signing, so the value delivered floats with the buyer's stock price and the buyer absorbs the price risk●●●●○
    • A floating exchange ratio (fixed value) sets the dollar value per target share and adjusts the share count at close, shifting risk to share dilution●●●●○
    • A collar floats the exchange rate but caps it, limiting the swing of either pure structure●●○○○
    • Walk-away rights are contractual outs that let a party exit the deal, typically arising on a material adverse change or unmet conditions●●●○○
    • Cash election or mixed consideration lets target shareholders choose between pure cash and a stock-plus-cash package●●○○○
    • CVRs are contingent value rights that pay target holders extra only if defined future events occur — effectively an earn-out in public deal form●●○○○

20. Let's say an acquisition is agreed to be at a fixed exchange ratio. Suddenly, the acquirer's stock price shoots up. Is this good or bad for the acquirer?

    Not measured yet
    • A fixed exchange ratio sets the number of acquirer shares per target share at signing, and that ratio does not adjust as stock prices move●●●○○
    • Because the ratio is fixed, the acquirer has committed to a fixed number of its own shares, so the total value it hands over rises and falls with its share price at close●●●●○
    • When the acquirer's stock rises, that increase in value handed over flows to the target's shareholders, who receive shares now worth more than at signing●●●●○
    • The target side therefore captures the benefit of the acquirer's higher share price, while the acquirer receives the same target and no additional consideration●●●●○
    • The acquirer is effectively paying a higher price for the same target and getting nothing extra in return — bad for the acquirer●●●○○

21. How do you determine whether or not a deal destroys/creates value? How can it look/be accretive but destroy value?

    Not measured yet
    • The premium paid is a prepayment of expected synergies — the deal creates value only if the present value of synergies exceeds that premium●●○○○
    • If the premium exceeds the synergies, the combined entity is worth less than what was paid for it — that is value destruction●●●●○
    • Accretion is an accounting test — whether combined EPS rises — and is separate from the economic question of whether value was created●●○○○
    • The premium can exceed the present value of realized synergies after the deal closes, destroying value even though the deal was underwritten as accretive●●○○○
    • Buying a lower-P/E target with stock mechanically raises EPS even when no real value is created, so accretion alone can signal value creation when there is none●●●○○
    • If the target's value declines after the deal, its P/E stays below the buyer's so EPS still looks accretive, yet combined value is less than the two standalone companies●●●●●
    • The deal itself can cause deterioration — consolidated revenue can fall below the two companies' separate revenues through customer loss or channel conflict●●●●○
    • Hidden liabilities discovered post-close erode the value the premium was underwritten by, another way an accretive deal destroys value●●●○○

22. A luxury soap brand manufactures in-house in the US and sell to big-box, via Amazon and DTC. How would you position this company for sale? Who is your ideal strategic buyer?

    Not measured yet
    • Position the company as a diversifier acquisition rather than a bolt-on: because it sells through big-box retail, Amazon and DTC, no single channel failure would collapse revenue, which de-risks the revenue base for any acquirer — the headline of the sale pitch.●●○○○
    • The DTC business is strategically valuable in its own right because it owns the customer relationship and supplies first-party data, which a strategic buyer can apply across its portfolio for targeting, product development and retention.●●●○○
    • The company manufactures in-house in the US, which means shorter lead times, tighter quality control and less exposure to overseas logistics risk.●●●○○
    • That US manufacturing base is a real supply chain advantage in an environment where resilience matters.●●●○○
    • It is a premium luxury brand, which means pricing power and the ability to hold price and margin in the luxury personal care segment.●○○○○
    • Strategic buyers are generally horizontal integrators — players at the same level of the value chain who want to add a complementary brand rather than buy a supplier or customer.●●●●○
    • There is also a semi-vertical play: big-box retailers increasingly carry their own soap lines and might want to expand into private-label wellness.●●●○○
    • Buyer type one: large CPG companies such as P&G, L'Oréal and Unilever looking to expand their premium and luxury portfolios.●●○○○
    • Buyer type two: mid-market beauty platforms backed by private equity that are rolling up brands and could bolt this onto an existing portfolio; buyer type three: a retailer seeking vertical integration into private-label luxury goods, which the domestic manufacturing capability would directly support.●●○○○

23. Company A ($10M equity value) buys company B for X amount. If it raises $5M in equity value from a P/E firm, what is its ownership split if it used 100% cash vs 50/50 cash & debt to buy?

    Not measured yet
    • The ownership split is driven solely by how much new equity is issued relative to total equity after the raise, not by how the purchase price is funded.●●○○○
    • Raising $5 million of equity on top of $10 million of existing equity value makes post-raise equity $15 million; the PE firm holds one-third and the original owners hold two-thirds.●●●○○
    • The PE firm writes the same $5 million equity check either way.●●●○○
    • Debt only changes the leverage on the balance sheet — more interest expense and financial risk — but it does not change equity value.●●●●○
    • Equity value is what ownership is measured against.●●●○○
    • Because the equity investment is identical in both cases, the ownership split is the same whether the acquisition is funded 100% with cash or 50/50 cash and debt.●●○○○

24. What can you do if you can only offer stock in an M&A deal but the target’s owners don’t want it? FOLLOW-UP: What are some risks associated with that method?

    Not measured yet
    • If the target's owners refuse to accept the acquirer's stock, the acquirer can raise cash by issuing new shares to public investors in a follow-on equity offering, instead of handing stock directly to the target's owners.●●●●○
    • Stock is the only consideration the acquirer can offer directly when the target's owners will not take stock.●●●○○
    • The cash raised in the follow-on offering is paid to the target's owners, so the sellers receive cash rather than stock.●●●○○
    • Risk: capital markets may be unfavorable at the time of the raise, forcing poor terms and fewer dollars per share issued, which makes the acquisition more expensive than planned.●●●●○
    • Risk: the new issuance dilutes existing shareholders, who then own a smaller slice of the company.●●●○○
    • Risk: a large new issuance increases the supply of shares in the market, which pushes the stock price down.●●●●○
    • Risk: an offering on weak terms can signal distress, which pushes the stock price down.●●●○○
    • Risk: both increased share supply and the distress signal push the stock price down, and that decline raises the effective cost of the financing.●●●○○
    • Risk: if the market turns against the offering entirely, the acquirer may not be able to raise the cash at all, which puts the whole transaction's financing at risk.●●●○○

25. What is a “Working Capital Peg”? Do buyers want a higher or lower working capital peg? What about the seller?

    Not measured yet
    • A working capital peg is a target level of net working capital the seller must deliver at closing so the business can operate normally from day one.●○○○○
    • Net working capital means current assets minus current liabilities, typically excluding cash and debt.●●○○○
    • Without a peg, the seller can strip working capital before handover — aggressively collecting receivables or stretching payables — leaving the buyer a business short of operating cash.●●●●○
    • The peg is usually set off a historical average of normalized NWC, with a closing true-up adjusting the purchase price dollar-for-dollar for the difference.●●●○○
    • The seller wants a lower peg, because delivering less working capital lets them extract more cash from the business before the buyer takes over.●●●○○
    • The buyer wants a higher peg, because more current assets come with the business at no cost beyond the agreed purchase price.●●●○○
    • A higher peg benefits the buyer because the seller must leave more cash and current assets in the business at closing than the buyer effectively pays for through the price adjustment.●●●○○

26. Would you add a target company’s NI to your EBITDA? Why or why not?

    Not measured yet
    • EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization — operating profitability before financing and tax effects.●●●●○
    • Net income sits below all of those lines, so it is an after-tax, after-financing figure.●●●●○
    • Adding net income to EBITDA double counts interest, taxes, and D&A, because net income already includes the EBITDA components, and produces a meaningless blended number.●●●○○
    • Instead, merge each underlying line item individually — combine revenue with revenue and each operating expense with its counterpart.●●●○○
    • Then rebuild the combined EBITDA from those merged line items from the ground up, rather than adding one company's bottom line to the other's EBITDA.●●●○○

27. What does it mean for an acquisition to be ‘accretive’?

    Not measured yet
    • An acquisition is accretive when the value the target brings exceeds what the buyer pays for it — the deal adds to the buyer's worth.●●○○○
    • Accretion is measured on reported results, not projections: pro forma EPS — standalone buyer EPS plus the target's contributed earnings, adjusted for new shares and after-tax financing costs — must come out higher than the buyer's standalone EPS.●●●○○
    • EPS accretion occurs when the target's earnings contribution exceeds the after-tax cost of financing — interest on new debt plus earnings spread over newly issued shares.●●●○○
    • The second test compares yield — the return on the investment, effectively target earnings or EBITDA over purchase price — to the WACC.●●●○○
    • WACC represents the blended cost of the debt and equity used to finance the acquisition.●●●●○
    • Value creation requires the acquired yield (target earnings or EBITDA over purchase price) to exceed the buyer's WACC; the deal is dilutive to value, not merely to EPS, when that yield falls short of the cost of capital.●●●●○
    • The two tests can diverge: a cheap debt-funded deal can be EPS-accretive yet still destroy value if the yield doesn't clear the cost of capital.●●●○○

28. How would you advise a client planning on selling their business if a buyer approaches, offering to buy it for $2B?

    Not measured yet
    • (definition) This is an inbound offer, and the advisor's job is to ensure the client sells at full value or not at all●●○○○
    • (mechanism) Before reacting to $2B, establish fair value with DCF, trading comps, and precedent transactions, since the headline price is meaningless without a benchmark●●●●○
    • (mechanism) Research the buyer's past acquisitions and motivation to judge whether they're a credible strategic or financial payer and whether the offer is firm or an opener●○○○○
    • (causal) An unsolicited offer is usually an opening position, so the advisor creates competitive tension around it●●●●○
    • (mechanism) Create tension by preparing a CIM, marketing to other logical buyers, and soliciting LOIs so the original buyer knows they face competition●●○○○
    • (mechanism) Drive process on deal terms — management presentations, term sheets, and final bids — comparing structure, financing certainty, and regulatory risk, not just headline price●●●○○
    • (condition) Evaluate alternatives — staying independent, IPO, recapitalization, another buyer — because $2B must beat the best standalone plan on a risk-adjusted basis●●●○○
    • (contrast) Present a formal recommendation with valuation and process results, but the board makes the decision and the banker only advises●●○○○

29. Besides the IS and BS, what else would you ask for to evaluate an acquistion?

    Not measured yet
    • Beyond the income statement and balance sheet, start with the cash flow statement, because for an acquisition you care about actual cash generation, not accrual earnings●●○○○
    • Want historical financials going back several years to see whether growth and margins are stable trends●●●○○
    • Want the deal terms: the asking price and how the deal is financed — cash, stock, or debt●●●○○
    • If there is existing debt, ask for the full debt schedule, specifically covenants, maturities, and change-of-control provisions●●●○○
    • Ask for a customer and revenue breakdown to spot concentration risk●●●○○
    • Want comparable transactions to benchmark the price●●●○○
    • Want off-balance-sheet obligations — operating leases, pending litigation, and pension deficits — which are real liabilities the balance sheet does not show●●○○○
    • Want a short bio on the management team●●○○○
    • Request management's projections along with the underlying model and its assumptions so the forecast can be pressure-tested●●○○○

30. What key sections would you include in a pitchbook to sellers?

    Not measured yet
    • A sell-side pitchbook sells the deal story to a seller — it is a marketing document presented to win a mandate to sell the company.●●●○○
    • I'd open with an executive summary, then the strategic rationale for why a sale creates value now.●●●○○
    • Next comes a target overview covering product, history, customers, and strategy, followed by industry analysis in market context.●●○○○
    • The analytical core is the valuation analysis: it uses trading comparables, precedent transactions, and a DCF to reach an implied sale value.●●○○○
    • Valuation analysis is supported by historical and projected financials.●●○○○
    • I'd add an accretion/dilution analysis showing the EPS impact for likely buyers.●●○○○
    • Then the proposed transaction structure, and close with risk factors.●●○○○
    • For a prospective client rather than an engaged seller, add the potential buyers and the rationale for each.●●●○○
    • For a prospective client, also add the process and timeline plus the bank's transaction and deal credentials.●●○○○

31. Why would 2 companies choose to enter into a joint venture (7 reasons)?

    Not measured yet
    • A joint venture is a jointly owned entity or contractual arrangement in which two companies pursue a specific project while remaining independent●○○○○
    • One reason is collaboration while each parent keeps its independence — a partnership without the merger or full integration that would dissolve separate corporate identities●●○○○
    • Risk-sharing: the specific mechanism is that an expensive or uncertain project is placed in a separate vehicle, so losses and liabilities are allocated between the partners rather than sitting entirely on one company's balance sheet●●●○○
    • Complementary capabilities: each partner contributes a specific capability the other lacks — for instance technology paired with distribution channels — so the venture combines resources that neither could supply internally●●○○○
    • Market entry: a local partner supplies the specific geographic knowledge, relationships, or regulatory access required to operate in a new country, which the entering firm does not have●●●○○
    • Resource pooling: partners contribute capital, assets, and personnel to a shared entity to reach a scale of funding, capacity, or operations that neither would finance or staff on its own●●○○○
    • Strategic testing: a JV is a low-commitment way to trial a business or market before deciding to buy or build it fully, limiting exposure if the venture fails●●●○○
    • Regulatory considerations: structuring cooperation as a JV allows the parties to fit within foreign ownership limits or clear antitrust hurdles that a full merger or acquisition would trigger●●○○○
    • The through-line: a JV captures the benefits of cooperation without the cost, commitment, and irreversibility of a full acquisition●●●●●

32. What types of synergies (3) exist in M&A transactions? Please give examples of each type.

    Not measured yet
    • Synergies are value a combination creates that neither company could achieve alone, and they come in three types●○○○○
    • Revenue synergies increase the combined top line by selling more than the two companies could separately, through cross-selling to each other's customers, geographic expansion, and new product lines●●○○○
    • Cost synergies shrink the combined expense base by eliminating duplication across the two companies, through shared overhead, reduced duplicate headcount, and consolidated facilities●●○○○
    • Financial synergies lower the cost of capital — the stronger combined balance sheet borrows on better terms, enabling cheaper financing for the merged entity●●○○○
    • Revenue synergies require a specific cross-selling or market-expansion mechanism to be a real synergy rather than just a label●●●○○
    • Cost synergies are more concrete and realized sooner, so they're more credible; revenue synergies often deserve a haircut in valuation●●●●○

33. Why might governments seek to deter/block inter-company M&A transactions (7)?

    Not measured yet
    • Antitrust Laws and Market ConcentrationGovernments block M&A transactions to enforce antitrust laws and prevent excessive market concentration that reduces competition.●●●●●
    • National Security Cross-Border Deal RisksNational security and defense concerns can cause regulators to block M&A deals, particularly cross-border transactions.●●●●○
    • Consumer Protection M&A InterventionTransactions may be deterred to ensure consumer protection against price gouging, lower quality, or limited choices.●●●●○
    • Systemic Risk and Labor ImpactsRegulators intervene in M&A to mitigate systemic risk to the broader economy and prevent severe adverse labor market impacts.●●●○○
    • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity RisksData privacy and cybersecurity risks arising from combined corporate datasets serve as valid grounds to block M&A deals.●●●○○

34. Why would a company want to sell/divest a part of its business?

    Not measured yet
    • A divestiture is the sale of part of a company — a division, subsidiary, or product line — to another party.●●○○○
    • A buyer with synergies may pay more for the unit than the market values it at inside the parent, so selling can capture value the public market was discounting.●●●○○
    • Selling a unit delivers immediate cash proceeds to the parent, whereas holding it yields only future cash flows that are uncertain and already reflected in the share price.●●●○○
    • With one fewer business, management time and capital concentrate on the core, and investors typically reward pure-play focus with a higher multiple.●●○○○
    • Because the sale proceeds are cash rather than a claim on the whole company, the parent can fund growth, pay down debt, or buy back stock without issuing new shares.●●○○○
    • Exiting a unit frees the capital tied up in it for redeployment into businesses the company judges more attractive.●●●○○
    • Divesting a unit lets management stop funding a business whose strategic fit with the remaining company has weakened.●●●○○
    • Selling a failing, low-margin, or capital-intensive division removes a drag on consolidated margins and returns on capital.●●●○○
    • Divesting a division that no longer fits the parent's strategy simplifies the company into a more focused, easier-to-understand business.●○○○○

35. (open) What 2 companies would you merge now and why?

    Not measured yet
    • Strategic rationale means identifying an asset gap one company has that the other fills — e.g., Disney owns world-class IP but lacks in-house gaming capability.●●●●○
    • The fit test is extension, not overlap: the target's capabilities must add something the buyer does not already have.●●●●○
    • EA's game engines and live-services expertise constitute the capability Disney lacks in-house.●●●○○
    • EA's distribution reach is a capability Disney does not already own.●●●●●
    • Revenue synergies: owning the target lets the buyer monetize in-house what it currently licenses away, keeping the full economics of the IP.●●●○○
    • Further revenue synergies include cross-selling subscriptions such as bundling EA Play with Disney+, plus joint marketing across franchises.●●●○○
    • Cost synergies: eliminate the licensing fees the buyer pays third parties today, cut duplicate corporate overhead, and lower customer acquisition costs.●●●○○
    • A strong answer specifies the integration challenges that must be managed for the deal to deliver its synergies — e.g., reconciling a game studio's development culture and production pipeline with a media buyer's existing operations.●●○○○

36. A deal looks too accretive. What might you adjust in the assumptions to shift the EPS downwards?

    Not measured yet
    • Raising the purchase price cuts EPS because a higher price means a larger debt draw or more shares issued.●●●○○
    • Raising the purchase price also increases the intangible amortization recorded.●●●○○
    • Lowering the revenue projections reduces combined net income dollar-for-dollar.●●○○○
    • Decreasing the synergy estimates is the first place to look.●●●○○
    • Synergy timing matters as well as size — pushing realization out further reduces the accretion shown in the projection window.●●●○○
    • You can also raise the cost of financing by assuming a higher interest rate on the debt.●●●○○
    • You can also raise the cost of financing by assuming a richer exchange ratio on the stock component.●●●○○
    • Add integration and transaction costs or purchase-accounting amortization if the model left them out.●●●○○
    • If the deal still looks accretive after conservative inputs, it may genuinely be accretive.●●●○○

37. A deal looks too dilutive for a buyer. What might a buyer do to try to boost EPS?

    Not measured yet
    • Dilution means pro forma EPS is lower than the buyer's standalone EPS, so the buyer attacks either the combined net income or the per-share cost of the deal.●●●○○
    • Funding with cash on hand or low-cost debt is cheaper per dollar of acquired earnings than issuing stock, because forgone interest on cash or after-tax interest on debt is typically less than the earnings yield being acquired.●●●○○
    • Editing the capital structure — refinancing existing debt at lower rates, extending maturities, or running the combined company with more leverage where cash flows support it — lowers the ongoing financing burden on EPS.●●●○○
    • Negotiating a lower purchase price means less financing required, less dilution, and a smaller amortization drag on the combined income statement.●●●○○
    • Structuring the deal consideration — for example, shifting the mix toward cash or debt and away from stock — avoids issuing the new shares that would enlarge the share count.●●●○○
    • Structuring the deal to avoid or reduce incremental amortization of intangibles or write-ups raises the combined net income that feeds pro forma EPS.●●●○○
    • Assuming and realizing more synergies raises combined net income — the numerator of EPS — directly lifting pro forma EPS.●●○○○
    • Raising the target's standalone earnings forecast is another lever, since target net income flows straight into the numerator of pro forma EPS.●●●○○

38. Assume you are speaking to a client. Explain why buying a company with a higher P/E is dilutive to shareholders (assume all-stock)

    Not measured yet
    • A deal is accretive when the earnings yield you buy exceeds the cost of financing the purchase, and dilutive when it does not.●●●○○
    • In an all-stock deal the financing cost is the acquirer's own earnings yield: every new share issued claims a slice of acquirer earnings at the acquirer's P/E, so issuing stock costs one over its P/E.●●●●●
    • A higher-P/E target has a lower earnings yield, so each dollar of purchase price buys fewer dollars of target earnings.●●●○○
    • The specific comparison that determines dilution is the target's earnings yield versus the acquirer's earnings yield: if the target's yield is lower, the deal is dilutive.●●●●○
    • The acquirer issues shares carrying a high earnings yield and receives in exchange target earnings carrying a low one.●●●○○
    • Example: an acquirer at 10x (10% yield) buying a 20x target (5% yield) issues $100 of stock that costs $10 of earnings support but delivers only $5 of earnings.●●●○○
    • The shortfall between earnings given up and earnings gained is spread over the enlarged share count, so pro forma EPS falls.●○○○○

39. Is it problematic if an overvalued company buys another overvalued company (since deal currency is the same)?

    Not measured yet
    • In a stock-for-stock deal, the deal currency is the buyer's own shares, so the buyer's valuation determines the effective price paid●●○○○
    • When the buyer's shares are overvalued, each share issued carries more headline value than real value, so for a given headline purchase price the buyer parts with less real value than the target receives on paper●●●○○
    • What matters is not the absolute fact that both companies are overvalued but the relative overvaluation of buyer versus target●●●●○
    • Because overvaluation is not permanent, a buyer's multiple correcting before close, or before the target's does, can move the exchange-ratio economics against the buyer●●○○○
    • If the buyer is more overvalued than the target, it pays with inflated currency and captures value from the target's shareholders●●●○○
    • When the buyer is more overvalued than the target, the deal is cheap financing, not a problem●●●○○
    • The risky case is an overvalued buyer that is less overvalued than the target, or an undervalued buyer using stock: it issues more shares than the real value transferred justifies and overpays in economic terms●●●○○

40. How would you distribute synergies?

    Not measured yet
    • Synergy distribution is the split of value created by the combination between the seller's and the buyer's shareholders●●○○○
    • The acquisition premium — the price paid above the target's standalone value — is how the seller captures its share of the synergies●●●●○
    • The buyer does not receive the portion of the synergy benefit paid out as premium●●●●○
    • Both the seller and the buyer share the synergies, so the buyer acquires the target above standalone value rather than at standalone value●○○○○
    • Sellers typically capture 25-50% of expected synergy value through the premium●●●●○
    • The buyer retains the remainder — synergies realized post-close in excess of the premium paid — as incremental value●●●○○
    • Bankers compare the premium paid to the present value of the synergies to advise the client on whether the deal creates value●●●●○
    • If the premium exceeds the PV of synergies the buyer overpaid and destroyed value; below it, the buyer keeps positive value●●●○○

41. What is a fairness opinion? What is included in it?

    Not measured yet
    • A fairness opinion is a letter from an independent financial advisor to a company's board on whether the transaction is fair from a financial point of view.●○○○○
    • The board uses the fairness opinion to support its recommendation to shareholders and to satisfy its fiduciary duty not to mislead them.●●○○○
    • It provides the board meaningful protection against shareholder litigation over the price.●●●○○
    • The word independent matters: the advisor must be free of conflicts so the valuation of the target is genuinely unbiased.●●●●○
    • A fairness opinion contains a range of valuations of the target based on the analyses performed, typically DCF, trading comparables, and precedent transactions, and presents the valuation as a range rather than a single number.●●●○○
    • A fairness opinion contains the assumptions, limitations, and qualifications of the analyses — what the advisor relied on, what was excluded, and where the analysis could be wrong.●●●○○
    • A fairness opinion ends with the advisor's explicit conclusion on whether the price or consideration is fair from a financial point of view.●●○○○

42. Walk me through a merger model and tell me how you determine whether or not it is accretive/dilutive

    Not measured yet
    • A merger model combines the acquirer's and target's projected financial statements to measure the deal's impact on the acquirer's EPS.●○○○○
    • Step one is projecting each company's income statement separately to establish standalone net income and standalone EPS as the baseline.●●●●○
    • Step two is determining the purchase price and financing mix.●●○○○
    • Cash used from the balance sheet costs the acquirer the interest income it would otherwise have earned on that cash.●●●●●
    • New acquisition debt adds after-tax interest expense equal to the coupon times one minus the tax rate.●●●○○
    • Stock consideration increases diluted shares by the value of stock issued divided by the acquirer's share price.●●●○○
    • Pro forma net income combines the acquirer's and target's net income, plus synergies, less incremental amortization and one-time transaction costs, after financing adjustments.●●●○○
    • Pro forma EPS equals pro forma net income divided by the new diluted share count, which combines the acquirer's standalone shares with any shares issued as consideration.●●●○○
    • The deal is accretive if pro forma EPS exceeds standalone EPS, dilutive if it is lower — and you quote the accretion/dilution percentage.●○○○○

43. What should a company consider when decided whether to pursue M&A now or 6 months down the line (6-8)?

    Not measured yet
    • Timing an M&A decision means judging whether the conditions that determine deal value and feasibility are better now or likely to be better in six months.●○○○○
    • Market conditions: whether current valuation multiples are favorable and whether they could change over the next six months.●●○○○
    • Interest rate environment: financing costs may rise or fall, changing the cost of a debt-funded deal.●●●○○
    • Regulatory landscape: antitrust or industry regulation could shift and block or complicate the deal later.●●○○○
    • Competitive dynamics: other buyers looking at the target can bid up the price or win it if you wait.●●●○○
    • Target's trajectory: a well-performing target's valuation is likely to rise, so waiting may cost more.●●●○○
    • Integration readiness: the acquirer needs management bandwidth to integrate, and rushing destroys value.●○○○○
    • Stock price: if paying with stock, a depressed acquirer share price means issuing more shares per dollar of consideration.●●●○○
    • Strategic urgency: how critical the deal is to the strategic plan can force acting now despite worse conditions.●●○○○

44. What does it mean for a deal to be accretive/dilutive? What is the basic calculation to determine this?

    Not measured yet
    • Accretive means the price paid for the target is less than the earnings the target contributes, so acquirer shareholders benefit.●●●●○
    • Dilutive is the opposite: the earnings contribution is less than what shareholders pay, so EPS falls.●●●○○
    • EPS is the test because it captures both the earnings added and the financing cost of the deal — new interest or new shares.●●●○○
    • Standalone EPS is the acquirer's own net income divided by its diluted shares before the deal.●●●●○
    • Pro forma EPS is combined, financing-adjusted net income divided by the new share count if stock was issued.●●●●○
    • Accretion/dilution is the percent change: pro forma EPS minus standalone EPS, over standalone EPS — positive is accretive, negative is dilutive.●●○○○
    • A deal is dilutive when the target's earnings yield is below the acquirer's P/E paid for it.●●●○○

45. What is the difference between a strategic & financial buyer from a reasoning standpoint? What would be the reason a strategic & financial buyer would want to buy a target company?

    Not measured yet
    • A strategic buyer is an operating company acquiring to improve its own business, judged on EPS accretion/dilution and strategic fit.●○○○○
    • Strategic buyers justify purchases with revenue synergies like geographic expansion, market dominance, and new products or technology.●●○○○
    • Strategic buyers also justify purchases with cost synergies — eliminating duplicate overhead, combining operations, or cutting the target's standalone costs.●●●○○
    • Synergies let a strategic buyer pay a control premium above the target's standalone value, because the combined entity is worth more than the sum of its parts.●●○○○
    • A financial buyer is a sponsor acquiring to generate a return on invested equity, not to own the business permanently.●○○○○
    • Financial buyers measure success by IRR and MOIC — the multiple on invested capital — and a deal only makes sense if it clears the fund's required return.●●●○○
    • Sponsors use leverage to amplify equity returns: the same value gain measured against a smaller equity base is a larger percentage return.●●●○○
    • Unlike strategic buyers, financial buyers demand a minimum IRR and will walk away from deals that cannot clear that hurdle.●●○○○
    • Both buyer types evaluate the target's ability to grow EBITDA, but the sponsor ties that growth to its exit and required return.●●●●○

46. What are the pro/cons of selling to a strategic vs financial buyer? Which do owners prefer (if they want the most amount of money possible)? As a banker, which would you want to sell to?

    Not measured yet
    • A strategic buyer is an operating company in the same or adjacent industry acquiring for synergies; a financial buyer is a sponsor acquiring the company as an investment to resell●●○○○
    • Strategic buyers can pay higher valuations than financial buyers because synergies let them justify a bigger control premium than an investment-return model allows●●●○○
    • Strategic buyers fund the purchase off their own balance sheet or committed financing, so the deal carries essentially no financing risk●●●○○
    • A strategic sale forces the owner to hand confidential information to a competitor●●●●○
    • A strategic sale carries antitrust or regulatory review risk that a financial sale does not●●○○○
    • Integration risk and potential job losses make strategic deals less certain to close than financial sponsor deals●●●●○
    • Financial buyers offer a faster process, less deal risk, no antitrust scrutiny, and better confidentiality because they are not competitors●●○○○
    • Financial buyers pay lower purchase prices since they have no synergies to underwrite, and they carry a small financing contingency risk from their debt commitments●●●●○
    • For the banker it depends: strategic deals are more complex and often generate higher fees per deal, while financial sponsor relationships can produce repeat deal flow over time●●●○○

47. Which can offer more in an acquisition between a strategic & a financial buyer?

    Not measured yet
    • Generally, a strategic buyer can offer more for an acquisition target than a financial buyer can.●●○○○
    • Synergies consist of cutting duplicate costs and cross-selling to the target's customers.●●●●○
    • Synergies make the target worth more to a strategic buyer than it is worth standalone, which justifies a higher price.●●●○○
    • A financial buyer must hit a targeted IRR on its equity given realistic exit assumptions, and that required return caps how high it can bid.●●●○○
    • Sponsors usually lack operators, so they rely on existing management to run the business, often with attractive rollover and compensation packages.●●●○○
    • A sponsor can outbid a strategic buyer in a competitive auction if it has a strong proprietary angle on the asset.●●●○○
    • A sponsor can outbid a strategic buyer in a competitive auction if one of its portfolio companies creates synergies with the target.●●●●●
    • A sponsor can outbid a strategic buyer in a competitive auction if it is willing to underwrite more aggressive leverage assumptions.●●●●○

48. What are the key factors that impact the accretion/dilution of a transaction (4.5-6 factors)?

    Not measured yet
    • Accretion/dilution measures whether the deal raises the acquirer's EPS — accretive if it rises and dilutive if it falls●●●○○
    • The higher the purchase price, the more debt or stock must be issued, so price works directly against accretion●●●○○
    • Cheap debt keeps interest expense low, so the cost of financing directly supports or hurts accretion●●○○○
    • The financing structure itself carries ongoing charges — interest, arrangement fees, hedging — that hit net income every period●●●●○
    • In stock deals, accretion hinges on relative valuations: issuing shares at a higher P/E than the effective P/E paid for the target makes the deal accretive●●●○○
    • The larger the synergy pool, the more the combined earnings rise and the more accretive the deal becomes●●○○○
    • One-time transaction fees — advisory, legal, financing — are expensed upfront and depress first-year earnings●●○○○
    • Dis-synergies dilute the deal: customer attrition, key employee departures, cultural clashes, management distraction, lost supplier terms, and product cannibalization●●●○○
    • Integration fees and restructuring charges — severance, systems, facilities — reduce earnings in the early years post-close●●○○○

49. What makes a company a good acquisition candidate for a strategic buyer (10 total)?

    Not measured yet
    • A good acquisition candidate for a strategic buyer is a target whose purchase lets the buyer create value its own business cannot generate alone●●○○○
    • Geographic expansion: the target brings a customer base or region the buyer wants to tap into, increasing TAM and enabling cross-sell●●○○○
    • Diversifying reduces concentration risk in any one product or customer group●●●○○
    • Market dominance: buying share can move the buyer into a top-2 market position, which carries pricing power●●●○○
    • Vertical integration: owning suppliers or distribution captures margin that currently leaks to third parties and secures the supply or distribution chain●●●○○
    • Economies of scale: combining operations cuts unit cost through fixed-cost spreading and greater purchasing power on inputs the two firms both buy●●●○○
    • Tax benefits: deal structure can reduce taxes, for example an asset step-up or utilizing the target's NOLs●●●●●
    • An undervalued seller: buying below intrinsic value creates value even without operational synergies●●●○○
    • Weak motives that rarely justify the price alone: acqui-hires, a single patent, ego, and pre-empting a rival product●●●○○

50. Why do companies do mergers?

    Not measured yet
    • The core reason companies merge is to create value they cannot create standalone; the specific reasons are channels for that●●○○○
    • Geographic and product expansion brings a new market or customer base, growing TAM and enabling cross-sell●○○○○
    • Diversification through the merger reduces concentration risk in any one region, product, or customer●●●○○
    • Combining can push the company toward a top-2 market position, where it gains pricing power●●●○○
    • Vertical integration — owning suppliers or distribution — captures margin that previously leaked to third parties and secures inputs●●○○○
    • Economies of scale: larger combined volume spreads fixed costs over more units and improves purchasing power●●○○○
    • Structure can reduce taxes — for example an asset step-up or using the target's NOLs●●○○○
    • If the seller is undervalued, buying below intrinsic value creates value even with no operational synergies●●○○○
    • Weak motives — acqui-hire, a lone patent, ego, defensive pre-emption — sound like strategy but aren't●●●○○

51. Walk me through the sell-side M&A process, including key documents (8 steps)

    Not measured yet
    • The sell-side process is a competitive auction run to sell the company for the highest price and the most certainty of closing●●●○○
    • Planning means preparing legal due diligence, drafting a 1-2 page teaser, and writing the CIM that emphasizes competitive positioning, brand, and customer reputation●●●○○
    • In marketing, teasers are sent to prospective buyers to gauge interest, while the full CIM is distributed only to buyers who have signed an NDA●●○○○
    • Initial bids come in as LOIs and are evaluated on both price and certainty of closing●●●●○
    • In management presentations, buyers that have been shortlisted meet management, which is followed by access to the data room●●●●○
    • Final bids are LOIs or purchase agreement drafts, built on normalized cash flows — QoE, sustainable CapEx, normalized working capital and FCF●●●●○
    • Negotiations finalize the purchase agreement, with reps and warranties as the key negotiated terms●●●○○
    • At signing the definitive purchase agreement is executed, but the deal is not complete until closing occurs●●○○○
    • At closing the buyer funds the purchase price and the necessary regulatory approvals are obtained, which completes the process●●●○○

52. You’re representing a US coffee producer trying to sell your company. What buyers are you looking for (4 categories)?

    Not measured yet
    • In a sell-side process the buyer universe is segmented by why each type of buyer would pay for the asset.●●●○○
    • For a US coffee producer there are four buyer categories: strategic, private equity, international, and competitors.●○○○○
    • Strategic buyers are companies positioned up- or downstream in the value chain, such as a drinkware maker or beverage company extending into coffee.●●●○○
    • Strategics can pay the highest price because they capture synergies from integrating the target's product into their existing business.●●●○○
    • PE buyers are financial sponsors looking to own the coffee brand as a platform or add-on and grow it for a future exit.●○○○○
    • International buyers are foreign food and beverage companies seeking entry into the US market.●○○○○
    • International buyers would pay for the target's US footprint rather than build it themselves, because building it would be slow and expensive.●●○○○
    • Competitors in the coffee industry buy to consolidate, gaining market share and cutting overlapping costs.●○○○○
    • Running all four buyer groups in parallel creates competitive tension that raises the sale price.●○○○○

53. How do you quantitatively determine that an acquisition is successful or not (value destruction + EPS accretion/dilution - 6 ways)?

    Not measured yet
    • An acquisition is quantitatively successful when it created value for shareholders rather than destroyed it, measured by the return on invested capital exceeding the cost of capital.●○○○○
    • There are six quantitative tests of acquisition success: EPS accretion/dilution, ROIC versus WACC, stock price performance versus market and peers, synergy realization against the deal model, revenue and margin trends versus standalone projections, and customer and employee retention.●●●○○
    • EPS accretion/dilution compares pro forma EPS to what EPS would have been standalone — accretion means the deal adds earnings per share.●●○○○
    • Stock price performance after announcement is the market's verdict — underperformance versus market and peers signals investors see value destruction.●○○○○
    • Synergy realization checks whether the specific cost and revenue synergies underwritten in the deal model are actually delivered on the promised timeline, not merely whether some synergies appear.●●○○○
    • ROIC versus WACC asks whether the return on the capital invested in the deal exceeds the company's weighted average cost of capital, using the deal's invested capital rather than the company-wide base.●●○○○
    • If ROIC is below WACC the deal destroys value regardless of what EPS does, so ROIC versus WACC is the stricter economic test.●●●●○
    • Revenue and margin trends are compared against standalone projections to see if the combined business outperforms what each company would have done alone.●○○○○
    • Customer and employee retention is tracked because high attrition is an early quantitative signal that value is leaking from the deal.●●○○○

54. What are key line items should you adjust after making an acquisition?

    Not measured yet
    • Post-acquisition adjustments restate the combined financials so they reflect the transaction as it actually happened●○○○○
    • Cash consideration paid reduces the combined cash balance●●●●○
    • Debt raised to fund the deal adds new borrowings to the combined balance sheet●●●○○
    • Stock consideration issued increases equity by the value of the shares issued●●●○○
    • Write tangible assets up or down, and recognize identifiable intangibles such as brand and customer relationships●○○○○
    • The fair value step-ups create deferred tax assets or liabilities, and the excess of price over net asset fair value becomes goodwill●●●○○
    • When less than 100% of the target is bought, the acquirer consolidates 100% of the target's assets and liabilities and recognizes a noncontrolling interest for the minority stake●●●●○
    • Working capital is adjusted for the gap between the target's actual working capital at close and the agreed normalized target level in the purchase price●●○○○

55. How do you quantitatively determine that an acquisition is successful or not (from a value destruction/creation & accretion/dilution perspective)?

    Not measured yet
    • An acquisition is judged successful by hard quantitative measures of value creation, not by whether the deal was completed, and not just by whether it was announced as strategically sound.●○○○○
    • The first test is EPS accretion/dilution: pro forma combined EPS for the merged entity versus the acquirer's standalone EPS, adjusted for the financing mix used.●●○○○
    • Accretion alone is an accounting outcome and is not automatically proof of real value creation; a deal can be EPS-accretive while destroying economic value.●●●○○
    • Stock price performance after announcement shows shareholders' verdict on whether value is being created or destroyed, distinguishing a successful deal from one the market reads as value-destructive.●●○○○
    • Synergy realization is measured by comparing actual cost and revenue synergies achieved post-close against the specific synergies promised at announcement, not just by whether stated targets were nominally met.●●○○○
    • The deal must earn a ROIC above the WACC that financed it; below that threshold, it is destroying value even if the combined entity remains profitable.●●●●○
    • Revenue and margin trends post-close should be compared to the target's standalone projections to determine whether the target performs better under the acquirer than it would have independently.●●●○○
    • Customer retention must be tracked, because churn means the revenue base and relationships the acquirer paid a premium for are disappearing.●●○○○
    • High employee attrition post-close is a quantitative signal of value destruction, since the talent and human capital acquired were part of the purchase price.●●○○○

56. What actually is goodwill? How is it derived/calculated in a M&A deal?

    Not measured yet
    • Goodwill is the intangible asset that lands on the acquirer's balance sheet when the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the target's net identifiable assets●○○○○
    • To calculate goodwill, you first restate the target's assets and liabilities to fair value—tangible assets like PP&E and inventory plus identifiable intangibles like customer lists, brands, and IP, minus liabilities assumed●●●●○
    • Under purchase accounting the net asset value used is fair value, not book value, because everything is marked to market●●●●○
    • Goodwill equals the purchase consideration minus the fair value of the target's net identifiable assets, not the book value of its net assets●○○○○
    • Paying $1 billion for a company whose net identifiable assets are worth $700 million at fair value results in $300 million of goodwill●●●●○
    • The goodwill excess captures things that cannot be separately identified: reputation, workforce quality, expected synergies, and future growth opportunities●○○○○
    • Goodwill is not amortized; it is tested at least annually for impairment, and if the acquired business underperforms it is written down, with the write-down hitting earnings●○○○○

57. How do you model financing fees, transaction fees, and integration costs in a merger model?

    Not measured yet
    • Transaction fees such as banker and legal advisory fees are expensed immediately in the period the deal closes, not capitalized or amortized.●●○○○
    • Immediate expensing of transaction fees runs through the income statement as a non-recurring charge and reduces the combined entity's net income and retained earnings at close.●●●●○
    • Financing fees for raising the acquisition debt and equity are capitalized on the balance sheet, increasing the asset basis and reducing the net proceeds recorded as debt or equity.●●○○○
    • Capitalized financing fees are amortized over the life of the financing, typically five to ten years, usually via the effective interest method, creating a non-cash interest expense.●●●●○
    • Integration costs are one-time, non-recurring items that are expensed as incurred, not capitalized as part of the purchase price.●●○○○
    • Because integration costs are non-recurring, they are modeled as a separate below-the-line or explicitly flagged line item so they do not distort recurring earnings.●●●●○
    • Integration costs directly reduce the value created by the deal: net synergies equal promised run-rate synergies minus integration spend.●●●●○
    • Unlike transaction and integration costs, which are expensed, financing fees are capitalized, so the two categories hit the income statement on different timings and through different line items.●●●○○

58. What does a sensitivity table for an M&A transaction look like?

    Not measured yet
    • A sensitivity table shows how the deal's outcome changes as key assumptions are flexed across a range●○○○○
    • Each cell answers whether the deal is accretive or dilutive under that combination of assumptions, and by how much — the cell output is the EPS accretion/dilution for that scenario●●○○○
    • You typically flex two or three variables against each other●●●○○
    • Example axes: synergy realization percentage across the columns and purchase price or premium paid across the rows●●●○○
    • Other common axes are integration costs, financing cost or interest rate, and the mix of cash versus stock consideration●●●○○
    • Mechanically, you build the accretion/dilution model, link the table to the key input cells, and let Excel recalculate the EPS impact for every combination of assumptions●●●●○
    • The table surfaces breakeven combinations — it shows, for instance, which synergy realization level you need at a given purchase price to break even, where the deal flips from accretive to dilutive●●●●○

59. If a buyer is projecting to sell off a portion of the seller’s business later, how do you incorporate this?

    Not measured yet
    • The principle is to model the divested portion separately from the retained business from day one●●○○○
    • Carve the division's revenues, costs, and EBITDA out of combined projections so the model reflects only the retained business●●●○○
    • The divested portion is presented as a discontinued operation — its results and the gain or loss on disposal are reported separately from continuing operations, not buried in the retained business's ongoing earnings●●○○○
    • At the projected sale date, build in a divestiture gain or loss: sale proceeds minus the division's carrying value●●●○○
    • The tax effect of the divestiture gain or loss must flow through the model at the sale date●●●○○
    • Sale proceeds are treated as a source of cash at the projected sale date; they are not assumed to repay acquisition debt or reduce the financing needed in the sources and uses●●●●○
    • Interest expense is recalculated after the sale date only to the extent that any proceeds applied to debt actually reduce the outstanding balance●●●○○
    • On a present-value basis, expected divestiture proceeds offset the purchase price, since you're only paying for the retained business●●●●○

60. Why might a buyer recast a seller’s statements before merging them?

    Not measured yet
    • Recasting reworks the seller's financial statements before they are merged into the buyer's model●○○○○
    • Recasting is done for two main reasons●●●○○
    • The first reason is to strip out non-recurring items such as one-time gains, restructuring charges, and litigation settlements so the statements reflect a run-rate business●●●○○
    • Leaving a one-off gain in the combined model would inflate every projected year on a number that will never repeat●●●○○
    • The second reason is to align the seller's accounting policies with the buyer's so combined line items are comparable●●●○○
    • Alignment covers revenue recognition, depreciation and amortization methods, inventory accounting, and capitalization policies●●●○○
    • Two companies can report the same economics very differently●●●●●
    • If you merge distorted or inconsistently stated statements, the pro forma EPS is misstated●●●●○
    • The reason this matters is the EPS accretion/dilution impact, which is the headline metric the market and the board judge the deal on●●○○○

61. When would $100M of revenue synergies go straight into EBITDA?

    Not measured yet
    • Revenue synergies flow straight into EBITDA only when the incremental revenue carries no incremental cost.●●○○○
    • A price lift is the clean example: raising prices on existing customers adds revenue with no incremental cost, so every dollar falls through to EBITDA.●●●●○
    • In software, a company that buys another software company can cross-sell to its customer base, riding on R&D, infrastructure, and maintenance that already exist and are paid for, so the extra revenue needs no new spend.●●○○○
    • In the software cross-sell case, no new engineering headcount or hosting cost is needed.●●●●○
    • Most revenue synergies do not qualify — realizing cross-sell revenue usually means hiring salespeople, carrying COGS, or spending on marketing.●●●○○
    • Typically only the margin on the synergistic revenue belongs in EBITDA, not the full $100 million.●●●○○

62. How would you determine how much a company should raise in debt in an M&A setting?

    Not measured yet
    • Sizing acquisition debt means determining how much borrowing the pro forma combined company can actually support●○○○○
    • The primary lens is the leverage ratio, measured on a pro forma combined basis that adds the target's EBITDA and the acquisition debt to the acquirer's figures●●●○○
    • Coverage — EBITDA divided by interest expense — shows whether pro forma cash flow can comfortably service the acquisition debt's interest payments●●○○○
    • Leverage rarely exceeds roughly 5-6x EBITDA, so that range is the practical ceiling on how much acquisition debt the company can raise●●●○○
    • If the deal needs more debt than the leverage ceiling allows, you cap the debt at that ceiling and fund the remainder with cash or equity●●○○○
    • A stable, recurring cash flow stream supports more debt than a cyclical one, so EBITDA quality calibrates where in the leverage range you land●●●●○

63. What is contribution analysis?

    Not measured yet
    • Contribution analysis measures how much each company in a merger contributes to the combined entity's bottom line●●●○○
    • You take key metrics — revenue, EBITDA, net income — for both companies and compute each side's percentage of the combined total●●●●○
    • Contribution analysis is primarily used in mergers of equals, where two comparable companies combine without a clear acquirer●●●○○
    • The main use of contribution analysis is setting the ownership split: each shareholder group's stake in the combined entity should track its share of the combined contribution●●○○○
    • The contribution percentages also support the exchange ratio in the merger●●●○○
    • The contribution percentages also support the allocation of board seats in the combined entity●●○○○
    • A careful version adjusts for one-time items and accounting differences so the split reflects sustainable contribution, not reported noise●●○○○

64. A classmate argues that foregone interest on cash should not reduce combined pre-tax income. Why is that wrong?

    Not measured yet
    • Foregone interest on cash is the interest income the buyer loses because the cash it once held is now used to fund the deal.●●●○○
    • Combined pre-tax income is built by adding each company's standalone projected pre-tax income, so any interest income embedded in those standalone projections is carried into the combined figure.●●○○○
    • Each company's standalone pre-tax income projection already includes an interest income line — the income each company was expected to earn on its cash balance.●●●●○
    • Once the buyer spends that cash on the acquisition, it no longer earns interest on it, so the interest income baked into the buyer's standalone projection has to be backed out of the combined pre-tax income.●●●○○
    • Without the adjustment, the model keeps counting interest income on cash the buyer doesn't have anymore, and the combined pre-tax income figure ignores that foregone interest is a real cost of the cash funding, overstating combined pre-tax income.●●●●○
    • Overstating combined pre-tax income makes the deal look more accretive than it really is.●●●○○
    • Foregone interest is a genuine economic cost of using cash as a funding source.●●●●●
    • Foregone interest is exactly parallel to the interest expense you'd record if you had borrowed the cash instead.●●●○○

65. What is a bargain purchase gain? When it happens, how does it show up on the 3 statements?

    Not measured yet
    • A bargain purchase gain arises when the price an acquirer pays for a target is less than the fair value of the target's identifiable net assets — the opposite of goodwill●●●●○
    • A bargain purchase typically happens in distressed or forced-sale situations, where the seller must sell quickly and cannot command fair value●●○○○
    • Once the purchase price allocation is complete and consideration is still below the fair value of net assets, accounting rules do not allow booking negative goodwill●●●●●
    • Since 2008, US GAAP has required the bargain purchase gain to be recognized immediately in the acquisition period●●●○○
    • On the income statement, the bargain purchase gain shows up as a one-time, non-operating gain that boosts net income in that period●●○○○
    • On the balance sheet, the buyer records the acquired assets and liabilities at fair value and records no goodwill asset●●○○○
    • On the balance sheet, equity rises because the bargain purchase gain flows into retained earnings●●○○○
    • The bargain purchase gain is non-cash, and the cash moved as deal consideration appears in investing activities, so the gain is backed out of net income in the operating cash flow reconciliation●●○○○

66. How do NOLs work in an asset vs stock purchase?

    Not measured yet
    • In an asset purchase the buyer buys specific assets, not tax attributes, so the NOLs stay with the seller and the buyer gets nothing●●○○○
    • In a stock purchase the buyer inherits the target's tax attributes, so the NOLs carry over subject to limits●●○○○
    • Section 382 caps annual NOL usage at the target's equity value times the highest adjusted federal long-term tax-exempt rate for the three-month period containing the ownership change●●○○○
    • Section 382 applies when an ownership change occurs — generally a more-than-50-percentage-point increase in ownership by 5% shareholders over a three-year testing period●●○○○
    • After a post-2017 NOL is used, it carries forward indefinitely and can offset up to 80% of taxable income in a later year●●●○○
    • A pre-2018 NOL still expires 20 years after the year it was generated●●●○○

67. Please explain how a DTL vs DTA works, please (then how they apply in merger models).

    Not measured yet
    • Deferred taxes arise from timing differences: the same income produces different tax expense on GAAP books than on the cash tax return●○○○○
    • If cash taxes exceed book taxes today, you record a DTA — you have prepaid taxes that will return as savings later●●●○○
    • A classic DTA source is NOL carryforwards, whose usable value is limited by Section 382 after an ownership change●●●○○
    • If book taxes exceed cash taxes today, you record a DTL — a deferred payment that comes due when the timing difference reverses●●●○○
    • In a stock sale, an asset write-up creates a DTL equal to the write-up times the tax rate●●○○○
    • The write-up DTL is set up as a deferred tax expense at close with no cash actually leaving the company●●●○○
    • When accelerated tax depreciation runs ahead of straight-line book depreciation, book taxes exceed cash taxes early on, so a DTL builds up●●●●○
    • The write-up DTL only exists in a stock sale — in an asset purchase the buyer gets a stepped-up tax basis, so no deferred tax arises●●●○○
    • In the merger model, the DTL amortizes over the write-up's life, lowering reported net income but leaving actual cash taxes unchanged●●●○○

68. How does writing up an asset affect the 3 statements?

    Not measured yet
    • An asset write-up restates the target's PP&E and intangibles up to fair value as part of purchase accounting●●●○○
    • At close the write-up is a balance-sheet-only adjustment with no cash outflow: assets go up by the write-up, a DTL is created equal to the write-up times the tax rate, and the remainder flows into the goodwill calculation●●●●○
    • Per the card owner's definition, the write-up increases OCI●●●●○
    • A same-year deferred tax expense offsets part of the OCI increase●●●○○
    • The income statement impact comes later: the higher carrying basis drives incremental depreciation and amortization that reduce net income●●●○○
    • Partially offsetting the lower net income, the DTL unwinds over the life of the write-up, so a portion of the deferred tax expense reverses and reduces book taxes relative to cash taxes●●●●○
    • On the cash flow statement, the lower net income is offset by adding back the non-cash incremental D&A and deferred tax expense●●○○○
    • Operating cash flow is essentially unchanged●●○○○

69. A buyer acquires a seller in a stock purchase for a purchase price of $1.5B. The seller has 800M of common shareholders’ equity and no existing goodwill. Buyer writes up PP&E and other intangibles by $200M and agrees to an earn-out of $100M (recorded as contingent consideration). Given a tax rate of 25%, how much goodwill is created?

    Not measured yet
    • Goodwill is the excess of total consideration over the fair value of the target's identifiable net assets●○○○○
    • The seller's net identifiable assets start at $800M of common equity, and the $200M write-up steps them up to $1.0B●●○○○
    • Because it is a stock purchase, tax basis does not step up, so the write-up creates a DTL of $200M times 25%, or $50M, reducing net identifiable assets to $950M●●●●○
    • The $100M earn-out is contingent consideration recorded at fair value, so it is added to consideration transferred, bringing the effective price to $1.6B●●●○○
    • Goodwill is $1.6B minus $950M, which is $650M●●●○○

70. Company A: 600M EV, 500M Equity Value, 60M EBITDA, 30M NI Company B: 200M EV, 200M Equity Value, 25M EBITDA, 10M NI A buys B using 100% debt at 10% interest, at a 40% tax rate. What are the new EV/EBITDA and P/E multiples?

    Not measured yet
    • Combined EV is 600M + 200M = 800M, since a 100% debt deal adds B's enterprise value to A's without issuing new equity.●●○○○
    • Combined EBITDA is 60M + 25M = 85M, giving a new EV/EBITDA of 800 / 85 ≈ 9.4x.●○○○○
    • Equity value stays at Company A's 500M because a 100% debt deal issues no new shares.●●○○○
    • Combined pre-deal net income is 30M + 10M = 40M.●●●○○
    • The 200M of acquisition debt at 10% costs 20M of interest per year.●●●●○
    • Interest is tax-deductible, so the after-tax interest cost is 20M × (1 − 40%) = 12M.●●●○○
    • Combined net income after the deal is 40M − 12M = 28M.●●●○○
    • The new P/E is 500M / 28M ≈ 17.9x.●●●○○

71. How does writing up an asset affect the 3 statements?

    Not measured yet
    • A write-up restates an asset's book value up to fair value, typically a PP&E step-up in an acquisition, creating incremental D&A.●○○○○
    • The write-up creates an extra D&A charge on the income statement, but the increase is realized as a tax deferral rather than a cash tax reduction.●●●○○
    • The DTL rises by the incremental D&A times the tax rate.●●●●○
    • The write-up increases book D&A while cash-tax depreciation is unchanged.●○○○○
    • On the CFS, net income falls by D&A × (1 − tax rate).●●●○○
    • The add-back of D&A and the subtraction of the DTL increase exactly offset the fall in net income, so cash flow is unchanged by the write-up.●●○○○
    • The DTL increase on the balance sheet is offset by the reduction in retained earnings from lower net income.●●●●○
    • Retained earnings fall by the after-tax D&A.●○○○○
    • On the balance sheet, assets include the asset write-up amount and Goodwill.●○○○○

72. What are gross NOLs vs NOL portions of DTAs?

    Not measured yet
    • Gross NOLs are the cumulative losses a company can deduct against future taxable income to avoid cash taxes.●●○○○
    • Gross NOLs are an off-balance-sheet tax attribute — a legal entitlement to shelter income, not a recognized asset.●●●○○
    • The NOL portion of the DTA books the expected cash tax savings, gross NOLs × tax rate, as an on-balance-sheet asset.●●○○○
    • Gross NOLs appear only in the tax footnote and deferred-tax roll-forward as a carryforward, whereas the NOL portion of the DTA appears as a recognized deferred tax asset on the balance sheet.●○○○○
    • The DTA equals gross NOLs multiplied by the applicable tax rate; it is separately reported from other DTAs (e.g., depreciation timing differences) and from the gross NOL carryforward itself.●●●●○
    • In an M&A deal, an ownership change under IRC Section 382 limits how much of the NOLs the buyer can use each year, so the annual usable amount is capped by the Section 382 limitation.●●●●○
    • Because of the usage limit, the buyer writes the DTA down to only the amount it can actually use.●●●●●
    • If the target may not generate enough taxable income to use the NOLs, a valuation allowance reserves the DTA against earnings.●●●●○
    • A gross NOL carried forward can exceed the NOL portion of the DTA because the DTA is limited by the applicable tax rate, the Section 382 annual cap, or the valuation allowance; if the gross NOL is $100 and the tax rate is 21%, the DTA is at most $21.●●●○○

73. US Buyer acquires a seller in a stock purchase for an equity purchase price of $1.5B. Seller has $400M of off-balance sheet NOLs expiring in 4 years, NOL portion of DTA is $100M. Adjusted rates for past 3 months is 3%, 4%, 5% and the buyer’s tax rate is 25%. What happens at close?

    Not measured yet
    • A stock purchase is an ownership change, so Section 382 caps the annual amount of the target's NOLs the buyer can use.●●●○○
    • The annual limit equals equity purchase price × the adjusted long-term rate: $1.5B × 5% = $75M per year, using the highest adjusted rate of the past three months.●●●●○
    • With the NOLs expiring in 4 years, the buyer can use 4 × $75M = $300M of NOLs.●●●●○
    • Against $400M of gross NOLs, $100M expires unused.●●●●○
    • At the buyer's 25% tax rate, the unused $100M of NOLs means a $25M DTA write-down at close.●●●○○
    • The write-down adds to goodwill in purchase accounting, while the remaining $75M of DTA stays on the balance sheet as usable tax savings.●●○○○

74. Acquirer = equity value of $800M and EV of $1B. Acquires target with purchase equity value of $300M and EV of $400M. Before you know the mix, what can you say about the combined equity value & EV?

    Not measured yet
    • Combined equity value equals the acquirer's equity value plus the value of new shares issued to the target's shareholders.●●●○○
    • In an all-stock deal the buyer issues shares worth the full $300M, so combined equity value is $800M + $300M = $1.1B.●●●●○
    • In an all-cash deal no shares are issued, so the acquirer's equity value is unchanged at $800M.●●●●○
    • With any cash/stock mix, combined equity value falls in the range $800M to $1.1B.●●●○○
    • Combined enterprise value is the two EVs added together: $1B + $400M = $1.4B, independent of the mix.●○○○○

75. A: NI = $200 Share Price = $6 Shares outstanding = 10 B: NI = $200 Share price = $5 Shares outstanding = 6 Company A buys B for all-stock at a 20% premium. What is the % change accretion/dilution?

    Not measured yet
    • Accretion/dilution is the percentage change in the buyer's EPS versus its standalone EPS.●○○○○
    • The purchase price is B's market cap of 6 × $5 = $30, and the 20% premium lifts it to $36.●●●●●
    • In an all-stock deal the shares are issued at the buyer's share price, so $36 / $6 = 6 new shares.●●●●○
    • The buyer has 10 shares outstanding, so the combined count is 10 + 6 = 16.●●●●○
    • Combined net income is $200 + $200 = $400, giving pro-forma EPS of $400 / 16 = $25.00.●●●○○
    • Standalone EPS was $200 / 10 = $20.00, so the deal is accretive by $5 per share, or +25%.●●●●○
    • A pays an effective 18x for B ($36 / $200 NI) while trading at 30x itself, so all-stock accretion follows.●●●●○
    • In an all-stock deal A issues expensive shares to buy cheap earnings, which is accretive.●●○○○

76. Company A = $20/share, $100NI, 100 shares outstanding. Company B = $5/share, $50NI, 100 shares outstanding. A buys B with 60% stock, 40% cash. Assume 40% cash is funded by 10% pre-tax interest at a 20% tax rate (no synergies) What is the pro-forma ownership - is the deal accretive? By how much?

    Not measured yet
    • The purchase price for B is 100 shares × $5 = $500, split 60/40 into $300 of stock consideration and $200 of cash consideration.●●●●●
    • The $300 stock portion is funded by issuing new A shares at $20, i.e. $300 / $20 = 15 new shares, bringing total shares outstanding to 115.●●●○○
    • The $200 cash portion is funded with debt at 10% pre-tax, giving $20 of pre-tax interest expense, which the 20% tax rate cuts to $16 of after-tax interest expense.●●●●○
    • Pro-forma net income is $100 + $50 − $16 = $134, so pro-forma EPS is $134 / 115 ≈ $1.17.●●●●○
    • A's standalone EPS is $100 / 100 = $1.00.●●●○○
    • The deal is accretive by $1.17 − $1.00 = $0.17 per share, or +16.5%.●●●○○
    • Ownership is split by consideration mix, not by relative earnings: A's shareholders own 100 / 115 = 86.9% of the combined company and B's shareholders own 15 / 115 = 13.1%.●●●○○

77. If buyer offers 30% premium with a 25x P/E and seller is a 20x P/E, is that accretive/dilutive for the buyer?

    Not measured yet
    • In an all-stock deal with no synergies, accretion/dilution is decided by comparing the buyer's own P/E to the effective P/E paid for the target (price paid / target net income).●●●○○
    • The seller trades at 20x earnings, and a 30% premium lifts the effective acquisition multiple to 20x × 1.30 = 26x.●●●○○
    • The buyer itself trades at 25x, below the 26x effective purchase P/E.●●●○○
    • The acquisition is dilutive because the buyer pays an effective 26x for the target's earnings while its own shares, and thus its currency for the deal, are valued at only 25x.●●○○○
    • At the purchase price the seller's earnings yield is 1/26 ≈ 3.8%, below the buyer's earnings yield of 1/25 = 4.0%.●●●○○
    • The shares the buyer issues claim more earnings than the target brings in.●●●○○
    • The 26x-versus-25x comparison and the resulting dilutive conclusion hold only if the buyer funds the deal entirely with stock and realizes no synergies from the target.●○○○○
    • The dilutive result can flip to accretive only if the buyer funds part of the deal with debt or cash cheaper than its own 25x equity, or if synergies raise the combined earnings enough to lower the effective P/E paid below 25x.●○○○○

78. A company with a 10x P/E multiple buys a company with a 20x P/E multiple. What is the breakeven cost of debt that would cancel out the difference?

    Not measured yet
    • The breakeven cost of debt is the interest rate at which an all-debt-funded acquisition is exactly EPS neutral.●●○○○
    • The target's earnings yield is 1 / 20x = 5.0%, which is the earnings the buyer picks up per dollar of purchase price.●●○○○
    • The target's full earnings flow into the combined income statement, with only after-tax interest as the offset; the after-tax interest expense exactly cancels the target's earnings contribution at the breakeven rate.●●●●●
    • Neutrality requires the after-tax cost of debt to equal the target's 5.0% earnings yield.●●●●○
    • Because interest is tax-deductible, the after-tax breakeven rate is grossed up to a pre-tax rate by dividing by (1 − tax rate).●●●○○
    • At a 20% tax rate, the pre-tax breakeven cost of debt is 5.0% / 0.80 = 6.25%.●●●●○
    • Borrowing below 6.25% makes the debt-funded deal accretive and borrowing above it makes the deal dilutive.●●●○○

79. A buy B (market cap of $200) for 30% premium. Generates $15 in cost synergies. Company A trades at a 10x EV/EBITDa. Create or destroy value?

    Not measured yet
    • Value creation is whether the value of synergies exceeds the premium paid to the target's shareholders.●●○○○
    • The premium is 30% × $200 = $60 of value transferred to B's shareholders.●●●●○
    • Because cost synergies are recurring EBITDA, they are capitalized at the company's multiple: $15 × 10x = $150 of value.●●●●○
    • Net value creation is $150 − $60 = $90, so the deal creates value.●●●○○
    • Recurring synergies deserve the EV/EBITDA multiple because they flow through as permanent additions to EBITDA, not one-time cash.●●●●○
    • The answer assumes the synergies are permanent run-rate savings and ignores realization costs and taxes.●●●○○

80. If you have WACC of 6%, acquirer’s WACC is 10% and a yield of 8%. Is it EPS accretive/dilutive (assuming you use the same capital structure blend as current company)? Does it create/destroy value?

    Not measured yet
    • Value creation is judged by comparing the deal's return to the target's own WACC.●●○○○
    • The target's 8% earnings yield exceeds its 6% WACC, so the deal earns two points above its risk-appropriate hurdle and creates value.●●●○○
    • The effective cost of funding the deal is the acquirer's 10% WACC.●●●●○
    • The 8% earnings yield is below the 10% funding cost.●●●○○
    • Because the earnings yield is below the funding cost, pro forma EPS falls.●●●○○
    • The deal is EPS dilutive.●●○○○
    • The two tests can give different answers because value measures deal economics against the target's risk while EPS measures the accounting result against how the purchase is financed.●●●○○
    • The deal creates value but is EPS dilutive.●●○○○

81. What does equity value mean in terms of purchase price? If both Company A & B have the same equity value but company A has $200M in cash no debt but company B has $500M in debt no cash (same equity value), discounting synergies, which acquisition is more accretive?

    Not measured yet
    • Equity value is the headline purchase price — what shareholders receive for their shares●○○○○
    • The real cost of buying a business is enterprise value: equity value plus debt minus cash, since the buyer assumes the debt and keeps the cash●●●○○
    • Company A's $200M of excess cash cuts its effective purchase price below the headline equity value, since the buyer effectively gets the cash back●●●○○
    • Company B's $500M of debt raises its effective cost above the same headline equity value, because the buyer assumes the obligation●●●○○
    • With equal equity values, the balance sheets create a $700M gap in effective purchase price for the same operating business and earnings●●●●○
    • Paying less for the same earnings raises the deal's earnings yield on the true price paid, so acquiring Company A is the more accretive deal●○○○○

82. Company A is 2x the size of Company B and is planning on acquiring Company B. Company B has a 25x P/E multiple, while Company A has a 50x P/E multiple. Assuming an all-stock deal, what is the % accretion to EPS?

    Not measured yet
    • In an all-stock deal, EPS accretion is determined by the ratio of the acquirer's P/E to the target's P/E: how many earnings-dollars are bought per earnings-dollar of stock issued●○○○○
    • '2x the size' means market cap (equity value): the acquirer's equity value is twice the target's, so P_A = 2 P_B●●●●○
    • Earnings are backed out as price divided by P/E, so E_A = 2 P_B / 50 = P_B / 25●●●●●
    • The target's earnings are E_B = P_B / 25, so the two companies have identical net income●●●●●
    • The acquirer issues shares worth the target's price P_B, half of A's existing share count, so shares outstanding rise 50%●●●●○
    • Combined net income is E_A plus the equal E_B, so net income doubles●●●○○
    • x/(1+x), where x is the target's size relative to the combined company, captures the impact of the new shares by size●●●○○
    • r - 1 captures the impact on net income relative to the acquirer's standalone earnings, where r shows whether the target's earnings are greater or smaller than the pro-rata expectation●●○○○
    • New EPS is 2 divided by 1.5 = 4/3 of the old EPS, a 33.33% accretion●●●○○